Programming PDF – Performance analysis of frameworks for interfaces between PRISM and MVVM LIGHT

CHIMBORAZO POLYTECHNICAL SUPERIOR SCHOOL

FACULTY OF COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING IN SYSTEMS

"FRAMEWORKS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS FOR INTERFACES BETWEEN PRISM AND

MVVM LIGHT APPLIED TO THE COMPANY CYBERTRONIC" [19659002] "GRADUATE THESIS PREVIOUS OBTAINING THE TITLE OF

ENGINEER IN COMPUTER SYSTEMS"

MARÍA FERNANDA GIRÓN BONILLA

VERÓNICA JANETH ARGUELLO PAZMIÑO

RIOBAMBA – ECUADOR

2014

We thank in the first instance to God because with his mercy and immense love

he has allowed us to reach this important point in our lives; to our parents

for giving us their unconditional support in each of our stages, to our

relatives and friends for their words, advice and help in each of our steps,

to our teachers, especially the Dr Julio Santillán, for his criteria in the present

work, Eng. Jaime Zapata, Ing. Ivonne Rodríguez, for his timeshare, his

valuable suggestions, to the school of systems engineering for being forging in

] our studies and the company CYBERTONIC for allowing us to carry out the

part of the present investigation.

María Fernanda Girón Bonilla

Verónica Janeth Arguello Pazmiño

I dedicate this thesis project to God, to my parents, to my family. God because always

has been with me in my life taking care of me and offering his blessings, to my parents

Marcelo and Marisol who have been the pillars from my childhood until today, to my

sister Belén who With your support to this goal, my uncle Marco

and especially my daughter Sophia, I also dedicate to all those who have believed in me

placing their trust in every challenge of my life without hesitation my ability and

intelligence.

María Fernanda Girón Bonilla

The conception of this thesis project dedicated to God, to my parents, to my husband and son

fundamental motors that flood my heart with desire to move forward

overcoming obstacles that along the way they present themselves and that they shelter me in their

branches of protection, support, trust but above all by showing me their love.

Verónica Janeth Arguello Pazmiño

SIGNATURES RESPONSIBLE AND NOTES

NAMES

SIGNATURE

DATE

ING. IVÁN MENES CAMEJO

DEAN OF THE FACULTY

_________________

__________________

DE INFORMÁTICA Y

ELECTRÓNICA

ING. JORGE HUILCA

SCHOOL PRINCIPAL

__________________

___________________

OF ENGINEERING IN

SYSTEMS

DR. JULIO SANTILLÁN

__________________

___________________

DIRECTOR OF THESIS

DR. NARCISA SALAZAR

__________________

___________________

MEMBER OF THESIS

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTER OF

___________________

___________________

DOCUMENTATION

AUTHOR'S RESPONSIBILITY

"We María Fernanda Girón Bonilla and Verónica Janeth Arguello Pazmiño, we are

responsible for the ideas, doctrines and results presented in this Degree Thesis,

and the intellectual heritage of the same belongs to the Polytechnic Superior School of

Chimborazo. "[19659002] ________________________________ ______________________________

María Fernanda Girón Bonilla Verónica Janeth Arguello Pazmiño

INDEX OF ABBREVIATIONS

DCL: Language of data control.

DDL: Data definition language.

DML: Data manipulation language.

DSDL: Data storage definition language.

GDI: Graphical interface repository.

IDE: Integrated development environment

MVC: Model View Controller.

MVVM: Model Vista View Model

SGBD: Relational Database Management System

USA: United States of America

WPF: Windows Presentation Foundation

INDEX GENERAL

AUTHOR'S RESPONSIBILITY ……………………………………. ………………………………………….. …. – 5 –

INDEX OF ABBREVIATIONS ………………………………. ………………………………………….. …………….. – 6 –

GENERAL INDEX ……………………. ………………………………………….. …………………………………….. – 7 –

INDEX OF FIGURES ……………………………………….. ………………………………………….. ……………. – 10 –

INDEX OF TABLES ……………………. ………………………………………….. …………………………………. – 11 – [19659002] INTRODUCTION ……………………………………….. ………………………………………….. …………………. – 12 –

CHAPTER I ……………….. ………………………………………….. ………………………………………….. …… – 14 –

REFERENTIAL FRAME ……………………………… ………………………………………….. ………………….. – 14 –

1.1.

Background ………………………………………. ………………………………………….. ………. – 14 –

1.2.

Justification of the Thesis Project …………………………………… ………………………….. – 15 –

1.2.1.

Theoretical Justification ……………………………………… ……………………………………. – 15 –

1.2 .two.

Justification Practice ……………………………………… …………………………………… – 16 –

1.3. Goals …………………………………………. ………………………………………….. ………….. – 16 –

1.3.1.

General Objective ……………………………………… ………………………………………… – 16 –

1.3.2.

Specific Objectives ……………………………………… …………………………………… – 17 –

1.4.

Hypothesis ………………………………………. ………………………………………….. ……………… – 17 –

1.5. Methods and Techniques ……………………………………….. ………………………………………….. – 17 –

1.5.1. Methods …………………………………………. ………………………………………….. ……. – 17 –

1.5.2.

Techniques ………………………………………. ………………………………………….. ……….. – 18 –

CHAPTER II …………………………. ………………………………………….. …………………………………….. – 19 –

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ………………………………………… ………………………………………….. ………………. – 19 –

2.1. Framework …………………………………………. ………………………………………….. ……………. – 19 –

2.2. Database ……………………………………….. ………………………………………….. ………….. – 19 –

2.2.1. Microsoft SQL Server ……………………………………….. ………………………………………. – twenty – [19659002] 2.3. Microsoft Visual Studio ……………………………………….. …………………………………………. – 21 –

2.3.1. Visual Basic ……………………………………….. ………………………………………….. ………. – 22 –

2.3.2. Visual C # ……………………………………….. ………………………………………….. ………….. – 22 –

2.4. Software Life Cycle ………………………………………. ………………………………………….. . – 22 –

2.5. Software Architecture ……………………………………….. …………………………………….. – 23 –

2.5.1. Design Model Model Vista Vista Model ……………………………………. ………. – 24 –

2.5.2. Application Layers ……………………………………….. ………………………………………… – 25 –

2.5.3. Advantages of the layers ………………………………………. ………………………………………. – 26 – [19659002] 2.6. Windows Presentation Foundation ……………………………………….. ………………………… – 27 –

2.7. Framework Performance ……………………………………….. ………………………………….. – 27 –

2.8. Prism Framework ……………………………………….. ………………………………………….. …… – 27 –

2.8.1. Advantage …………………………………………. ………………………………………….. ………….. – 28 –

2.8.2. Components …………………………………………. ………………………………………….. …. – 30 –

2.8.3. Design of the Application ………………………………………. ……………………………………. – 30 –

2.9 . MVVM Light Framework ……………………………………….. ……………………………………….. – 32 –

2.9.1. Advantage …………………………………………. ………………………………………….. ………….. – 32 –

2.9.1. Components …………………………………………. ………………………………………….. ….. – 33 –

CHAPTER III ………………………………. ………………………………………….. ………………………………. – 35 –

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF THE FRAMEWORKS PRIMS And MVVM LIGHT …………………….. – 35 –

3.1. Definition of the parameters to be compared …………………………………….. …



Source link

from Nettech Post http://bit.ly/2GMV4Ny